Re: BUG #16867: savepoints vs. commit and chain
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16867: savepoints vs. commit and chain |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e3fbc15b-9aef-b076-d72e-20b537186342@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #16867: savepoints vs. commit and chain (Arthur Nascimento <tureba@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #16867: savepoints vs. commit and chain
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 2021/02/17 3:03, Arthur Nascimento wrote: > Hi, Fujii-san, > > On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 at 01:49, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: >> In the server side, ISTM that CommitTransactionCommand() needs to handle >> the COMMIT AND CHAIN in TBLOCK_SUBCOMMIT case, but it forgot to do that. >> Patch attached. I'm not sure if this is a bug or an intentional behavior. >> Probably we need to look at the past discussion about AND CHAIN feature. > > I can confirm that your patch solved it for me. Thanks for looking into it. Thanks for testing the patch! As far as I read the past discussion about chain transaction, I could not find any mention that current behavior that you reported is intentional. Barring any objection, I will commit the patch that you wrote for psql and the patch I wrote. Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: