Re: race condition in pg_class
От | Alexander Lakhin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: race condition in pg_class |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e3fa725b-474c-c155-6a0d-5c97cbfbdc4a@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: race condition in pg_class (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: race condition in pg_class
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Noah, 28.06.2024 08:13, Noah Misch wrote: > Pushed. A recent buildfarm test failure [1] showed that the intra-grant-inplace-db.spec test added with 0844b3968 may fail on a slow machine (per my understanding): test intra-grant-inplace-db ... FAILED 4302 ms @@ -21,8 +21,7 @@ WHERE datname = current_catalog AND age(datfrozenxid) > (SELECT min(age(x)) FROM frozen_witness); -?column? ----------------------- -datfrozenxid retreated -(1 row) +?column? +-------- +(0 rows) whilst the previous (successful) run shows much shorter duration: test intra-grant-inplace-db ... ok 540 ms I reproduced this failure on a VM slowed down so that the test duration reached 4+ seconds, with 100 test: intra-grant-inplace-db in isolation_schedule: test intra-grant-inplace-db ... ok 4324 ms test intra-grant-inplace-db ... FAILED 4633 ms test intra-grant-inplace-db ... ok 4649 ms But as the test going to be modified by the inplace110-successors-v8.patch and the modified test (with all three latest patches applied) passes reliably in the same conditions, maybe this failure doesn't deserve a deeper exploration. What do you think? [1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=habu&dt=2024-07-18%2003%3A08%3A08 Best regards, Alexander
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: