Re: Best practice for: ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8"
От | Phoenix Kiula |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Best practice for: ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e373d31e0708151037g52e6219wcece85485528847e@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Best practice for: ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8" ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Best practice for: ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8"
Re: Best practice for: ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8" Re: Best practice for: ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8" |
Список | pgsql-general |
> What, exactly, does that mean? > > That PostgreSQL should take things in invalid utf-8 format and just store them? > Or that PostgreSQL should autoconvert from invalid utf-8 to valid > utf-8, guessing the proper codes? > > Seriously, what do you want pgsql to do with these invalid inputs? PG should let me, as the administrator of the database, decide whether I mind my DB to have an option to: 1. Either allow the "invalid" input 2. Or to continue storing the other information in the table even if an exception was thrown for the utf-8 column (which may be an unrequired column, for instance, so I may want it not to block the storage of other valid input which is more important) I am not advocating what others should do. But I know what I need my DB to do. If I want it to store data that does not match puritanical standards of textual storage, then it should allow me to... It's just a wishlist item from me, but I realize my voice may be inconsequential.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: