Re: Moving to postgresql and some ignorant questions
От | Phoenix Kiula |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Moving to postgresql and some ignorant questions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e373d31e0708141046t3cc114fcideb489bcbabb0f97@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Moving to postgresql and some ignorant questions (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Moving to postgresql and some ignorant questions
Re: Moving to postgresql and some ignorant questions Re: Moving to postgresql and some ignorant questions |
Список | pgsql-general |
> If you issue a BEGIN then nothing gets committed until you issue a COMMIT. If > anything happens in the meantime then everything you've done since the BEGIN > disappears. > There are some cases where I would like to bunch queries into a transaction purely for speed purposes, but they're not interdependent for integrity. E.g., BEGIN TRANSACTION; UPDATE1; UPDATE2; UPDATE3; COMMIT; If UPDATE2 fails because it, say, violates a foreign key constraint, then so be it. I want UPDATE3 to go ahead. Is this not possible, or is there an option I can use to do these kind of independent-query transactions?
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: