Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan
| От | David Steele |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | e3731aa0-678c-79e9-430f-0d68c90fb077@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or genericplan
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/1/17 3:59 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > Hi > > 2017-01-24 21:33 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com > <mailto:pavel.stehule@gmail.com>>: > > Perhaps that's as simple as renaming all the existing _ns_* > functions to _block_ and then adding support for pragmas... > > Since you're adding cursor_options to PLpgSQL_expr it should > probably be removed as an option to exec_*. > > I have to recheck it. Some cursor options going from dynamic > cursor variables and are related to dynamic query - not query > that creates query string. > > hmm .. so current state is better due using options like > CURSOR_OPT_PARALLEL_OK > > if (expr->plan == NULL) > exec_prepare_plan(estate, expr, (parallelOK ? > CURSOR_OPT_PARALLEL_OK : 0) | > expr->cursor_options); > > This options is not permanent feature of expression - and then I > cannot to remove cursor_option argument from exec_* > > I did minor cleaning - remove cursor_options from plpgsql_var > > + basic doc This patch still applies cleanly and compiles at cccbdde. Any reviewers want to have a look? -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: