Re: Should I care about this error "failed to link /usr/bin/psql[...] exists and it is not a symlink"?
От | Ekaterina Amez |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should I care about this error "failed to link /usr/bin/psql[...] exists and it is not a symlink"? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e2c8585d-4f91-8bd3-839d-f91ff644f203@zunibal.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should I care about this error "failed to link /usr/bin/psql [...] exists and it is not a symlink"? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should I care about this error "failed to link /usr/bin/psql [...] exists and it is not a symlink"?
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Hi Tom, El 3/12/19 a las 16:14, Tom Lane escribió: > Ekaterina Amez <ekaterina.amez@zunibal.com> writes: >> I'm installing postgres 9.6 in a CentOS 7 computer that already has >> postgres v9.2 installed (version that comes with CentOS installer) and >> I've seen the message of this mail's subject. >> ... >> failed to link /usr/bin/psql -> /etc/alternatives/pgsql-psql: /usr/bin/psql exists and it is not a symlink >> ... > I believe the issue here is that you've got Red Hat's postgresql packages > installed, As I've mentioned, this Postgres version comes with CentOs installation, so I guess you're right. > and they're not set up to participate in alternatives > switching. I'd suggest removing those packages By "removing those packages" you mean uninstall v9.2? This is a test computer and it's not a problem, but I'm afraid this is going to happen also in production server, by doing this won't be my cluster be unavailable? > --- having them installed > alongside PGDG postgres packages is going to lead to nothing but grief. > > regards, tom lane So what's happening is that I have installed a RH version of Postgres instead an official one? Am I right? Regards, Ekaterina
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: