Re: Fun fact about autovacuum and orphan temp tables
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fun fact about autovacuum and orphan temp tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e2973b17-32dd-6741-1b3c-b41b052103d8@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fun fact about autovacuum and orphan temp tables (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fun fact about autovacuum and orphan temp tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/21/16 8:47 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> It seems to me that you'd even want to make the drop of orphaned >> > tables mandatory once it is detected even it is not a wraparound >> > autovacuum. > If we are willing to do that then we don't really have to solve the > problem on the backend side. One could expect that autovacuum would > clean things up within a few minutes after a backend failure. Unless all the autovac workers are busy working on huge tables... maybe a delay of several hours/days is OK in this case, but it's not wise to assume autovac will always get to something within minutes. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: