Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently
Дата
Msg-id e23ad4ec-e03e-456d-9fa0-b681a6ab8a55@eisentraut.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently  (Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>)
Ответы Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently  (Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>)
Список pgsql-docs
On 19.11.23 21:34, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> * Making explicit references to ISO 8601:2004 where section numbers are
>    referenced.  Mostly in source comments but also a couple of places in
>    the docs.  This is about avoiding confusion as ISO 8601:2019 has been
>    published since then, with different section numbers[1].  The pre-2004
>    editions also have different section numbers.  References to general
>    ISO 8601 concepts (e.g. week numbers) are left unchanged because those
>    are not tied to any particular edition.

Maybe we should change the references to the 2019 edition instead?




В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Erik Wienhold
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently
Следующее
От: Erik Wienhold
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently