Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
От | Etsuro Fujita |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e18b9bf5-1557-cb9c-001e-0861a1d7dfce@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017/01/13 0:43, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Etsuro Fujita > <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> As I said before, that might be fine for 9.6, but I don't think it's a good >> idea to search the pathlist because once we support parameterized foreign >> join paths, which is on my TODOs, we would have to traverse through the >> possibly-lengthy pathlist to find a local-join path, as mentioned in [3]. > I'm not sure that's really going to be a problem. The number of > possible parameterizations that need to be considered isn't usually > very big. I bet the path list will have ten or a few tens of entries > in it, not a hundred or a thousand. Traversing it isn't that > expensive. > > That having been said, I haven't read the patches, so I'm not really > up to speed on the bigger issues here. But surely it's more important > to get the overall design right than to worry about the cost of > walking the pathlist or worrying about the cost of an extra function > call (?!). My biggest concern about GetExistingLocalJoinPath is that might not be extendable to the case of foreign-join paths with parameterization; in which case, fdw_outerpath for a given foreign-join path would need to have the same parameterization as the foreign-join path, but there might not be any existing paths with the same parameterization in the path list. You might think we could get the fdw_outerpath by getting an existing path with no parameterization as in GetExistingLocalJoinPath and then modifying the path's param_info to match the parameterization of the foreign-join path. I don't know that really works, but that might be inefficient. What I have in mind to support foreign-join paths with parameterization for postgres_fdw like this: (1) generate parameterized paths from any joinable combination of the outer/inner cheapest-parameterized paths that have pushed down the outer/inner relation to the remote server, in a similar way as postgresGetForeignJoinPaths creates unparameterized paths, and (2) create fdw_outerpath for each parameterized path from the outer/inner paths used to generate the parameterized path, by create_nestloop_path (or, create_hashjoin_path or create_mergejoin_path if full join), so that the resulting fdw_outerpath has the same parameterization as the paramterized path. This would probably work and might be more efficient. And the patch I proposed would be easily extended to this, by replacing the outer/inner cheapest-total paths with the outer/inner cheapest-parameterized paths. Attached is the latest version of the patch. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: