Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties
От | Hitoshi Harada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e08cc0400810280531k7c5eafafya6079774f7a138de@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2008/10/28 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > "Hitoshi Harada" <umi.tanuki@gmail.com> writes: >> 2008/10/28 ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>: >>> I tested the patch on mingw (Windows) and >>> got the following warning and error: >>> >>> A. gram.y: conflicts: 3 shift/reduce >>> B. include/nodes/plannodes.h:650: error: syntax error before "uint" >>> >>> I have no idea about A. > >> I have noticed it but didn't think it is a problem, but it doesn't >> occur in production, does it? > > We have a zero-tolerance policy for bison warnings. Patches that > introduce shift/reduce conflicts *will* be rejected. (And no, %expect > isn't an acceptable fix. The problem with it is you can't be sure > which warnings it ignored. In a grammar that gets hacked on as often > as PG's does, we couldn't rely on the conflicts to not move around, > possibly resulting in unforeseen misbehavior.) > > regards, tom lane > OK, I'll try to remove it. I'm not used to bison so my first task is to find where the conflict is... Regards, -- Hitoshi Harada
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: