Re: Downsides of liberally using CREATE TEMP TABLE ... ON COMMIT DROP
От | Andy Colson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Downsides of liberally using CREATE TEMP TABLE ... ON COMMIT DROP |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e011c9de-4239-0205-3c6e-94b60d20a057@squeakycode.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Downsides of liberally using CREATE TEMP TABLE ... ON COMMIT DROP (Ryan Murphy <ryanfmurphy@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Downsides of liberally using CREATE TEMP TABLE ... ON COMMIT DROP
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 01/28/2018 08:46 AM, Ryan Murphy wrote: > I believe the main, and maybe only, concern is the bloating of the system catalog tables since you are constantly addingand removing records. Yes, they will be vacuumed but vacuuming and bloat on catalog tables slows every single querydown to some, degree since every query has to lookup its objects is those catalogs. Though caching probably alleviatessome of that > > > Yes, that's exactly the concern I heard, thanks for reminding me. > > If I want to e.g. temporarily store a "setof records" or a "table" result in a variable as part of a calculation in a plpgsqlfunction, do I have any other option than CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE? It didn't seem to work when I DECLAREd a variableof type "setof table_name" or "setof table_name%rowtype", and then SELECT INTO it. > You may not need temp tables at all. You can use subselects, derived tables, and cte's: select sum(a+b) as total from ( select a, b+1 from detail ) as tmpx; This does the same thing as a temp table, with no temp table. -Andy
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: