Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene
От | Michael Riess |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dn64it$17bk$1@news.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
No, my problem is that using TSearch2 interferes with other core components of postgres like (auto)vacuum or dump/restore. > ... > > So you'll avoid a non-core product and instead only use another non-core > product...? > > Chris > > Michael Riess wrote: >> >>> Has anyone ever compared TSearch2 to Lucene, as far as performance is >>> concerned? >> >> >> I'll stay away from TSearch2 until it is fully integrated in the >> postgres core (like "create index foo_text on foo (texta, textb) USING >> TSearch2"). Because a full integration is unlikely to happen in the >> near future (as far as I know), I'll stick to Lucene. >> >> Mike >> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: