Re: Why is bool == java.sql.Types.BIT ??
От | Thomas Kellerer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why is bool == java.sql.Types.BIT ?? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dm2umf$sga$1@sea.gmane.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why is bool == java.sql.Types.BIT ?? (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why is bool == java.sql.Types.BIT ??
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Kris Jurka wrote on 23.11.2005 19:41: >> I noticed that table columns that are defined as "bool" (Postgres >> datatype) are reported as java.sql.Types.BIT through DatabaseMetadata >> (or ResultSetMetaData). >> >> Is there any valid reason why they are not reported as >> java.sql.Types.BOOLEAN? >> > > Because BOOLEAN is only available to JDBC3. Our driver still supports > JDBC2 so we use BIT. BOOLEAN and BIT are the same thing as far as we > can tell. Makes sense. I knew there was a reason :) The problem comes when supporting multiple DBMS. With MS SQL Server a bit column can only store 0/1 (which is not what the driver returns, as it uses a java.lang.Boolean) but PG only accepts the literals true/false. That's why I stumbled over this in the first place. So I'll have to check the native type rather then the JDBC type to be sure. Regards Thomas
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: