Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
От | William Yu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dlprnd$25d0$1@news.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( (Alan Stange <stange@rentec.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Alan Stange wrote: > Luke Lonergan wrote: >> The "aka iowait" is the problem here - iowait is not idle (otherwise it >> would be in the "idle" column). >> >> Iowait is time spent waiting on blocking io calls. As another poster >> pointed out, you have a two CPU system, and during your scan, as > > iowait time is idle time. Period. This point has been debated > endlessly for Solaris and other OS's as well. I'm sure the the theory is nice but here's my experience with iowait just a minute ago. I run Linux/XFce as my desktop -- decided I wanted to lookup some stuff in Wikipedia under Mozilla and my computer system became completely unusable for nearly a minute while who knows what Mozilla was doing. (Probably loading all the language packs.) I could not even switch to IRC (already loaded) to chat with other people while Mozilla was chewing up all my disk I/O. So I went to another computer, connected to mine remotely (slow...) and checked top. 90% in the "wa" column which I assume is the iowait column. It may be idle in theory but it's not a very useful idle -- wasn't able to switch to any programs already running, couldn't click on the XFce launchbar to run any new programs.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: