Re: PostgreSQL on Dual Processors, Dual-Core AMD Chips
От | William Yu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL on Dual Processors, Dual-Core AMD Chips |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dj5tpq$21uv$1@news.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL on Dual Processors, Dual-Core AMD Chips (Mark Rae <mrae@purplebat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL on Dual Processors, Dual-Core AMD Chips
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Mark Rae wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 12:32:36AM -0700, William Yu wrote: > >>Expect to need to upgrade to later Linux cores though. Previous kernel >>on this server was 2.6.9+ (FC3 64-bit) -- promptly kernel panic'd upon >>install of the DCs. FC3 installer did the same thing. Went to FC4 >>(2.6.11+) and it has run perfect for the past 3 months. We'll probably >>do a yum update to 2.6.13+ to take advantage of the better NUMA code now >>that we've successfully done this update on a less critical server. > > > You should definitely do the upgrade to 2.6.13, the previous > versions had problems were they would allocate memory to > the wrong bank of memory when using dual core CPUs. So you > would find only about a 20% improvement over a single core. > > With the newer kernels you should find that a dual core will > be giving you about 80% increase over a single core. I'm not experiencing this problem right now because I have NUMA disabled in the BIOS. :) I'm not sure NUMA will help that much for Postgres due to Postgres shared memory + OS caching architecture -- but I'll run it with NUMA on for a week and then compare it to NUMA off after we do the kernel upgrade. (Ordinarily, I would be afraid to do this type of testing on a production server but this 2xDC is so freaking fast, I can afford to give away 80%+ of the processing power and still be within my performance target.)
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: