Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL"
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | df776aee-7178-c531-8a34-2f1c07733ec1@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL" (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL"
Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL" |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/10/21 5:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Gavin Flower <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz> writes: >> On 11/06/21 8:17 am, Isaac Morland wrote: >>> ... But then there is "an historic occasion" so go figure. >> The 'h' in 'historic' is silent, at least it used to be -- I think now >> it is almost silent. So using 'an historic occasion' is correct. > It's silent according to the Brits, I believe. In America, the > pronunciation varies. > > I suspect "an historic" is bordering on archaic even in the UK these days. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: