Re: BUG #17723: cache lookup failed for type 0
От | Vik Fearing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #17723: cache lookup failed for type 0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | deb5b865-25de-b894-2d3d-44470eb86a88@postgresfriends.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #17723: cache lookup failed for type 0 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 12/16/22 18:10, Tom Lane wrote: > PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: >> This query: > >> WITH RECURSIVE > >> run(x, y) AS ( >> SELECT 0, 0 >> UNION ALL >> SELECT x, y FROM run AS r WHERE r.is_cycle >> ) >> CYCLE x, y SET is_cycle USING path > >> TABLE run >> ; > >> in which I mistakenly tried to access the is_cycle column from inside the >> wle, provokes the following error: > >> ERROR: XX000: cache lookup failed for type 0 >> LOCATION: typeOrDomainTypeRelid, parse_type.c:699 > > Yeah. We are calling addRangeTableEntryForCTE inside parse analysis of > the CTE's query, and it's generating a ParseNamespaceItem with p_vartype = 0 > because analyzeCTE hasn't yet identified the cycle_mark_type. That > eventually results in a Var with vartype 0, confusing later parse analysis. > > It looks to me like we can just move that part of the code up to before > we recurse to parse_sub_analyze, though. AFAICS, identification of the > cycle column type needn't (and had better not) depend on any > characteristics of the CTE's query. Indeed, it should only depend on the TO and DEFAULT subclauses (not shown here). Thanks for the fix! -- Vik Fearing
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: