Re: Fixing typos in tests of partition_info.sql
| От | Amit Langote |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Fixing typos in tests of partition_info.sql |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | de95965d-7e1e-ac0b-5cf8-90626a405f35@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Fixing typos in tests of partition_info.sql (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Fixing typos in tests of partition_info.sql
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018/12/17 16:38, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 04:14:07PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: >> --- A table not part of a partition tree works is the only member listed. >> +-- A table not part of a partition tree is the only member listed. >> >> How about: >> >> -- Table that is not part of any partition tree is the only member listed >> >> --- Views and materialized viewS cannot be part of a partition tree. >> +-- Views and materialized views are not part of a partition tree, >> +-- causing the functions to return NULL. >> >> How about: >> >> -- Functions returns NULL for relation types that cannot be part of a >> -- partition tree; for example, views, materialized views, etc. > > Your two suggestions look fine to me, so let's just reuse your wording. > i would just use the plural for the last comment with "Functions return" > as pg_partition_tree gets called multiple times, and later on > pg_partition_root will likely be added. Okay, let's use "Functions" then, although I wonder if you shouldn't tweak it later when you commit the pg_partition_root patch? Thanks, Amit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: