access control
От | De Clarke |
---|---|
Тема | access control |
Дата | |
Msg-id | de-980112190729.A0F433@ronin.ucolick.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] access control
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
About commercial databases lacking access control functionality to a degree "similar" to PG: hmm, I dunno about that. Seems like kind of a slur on the commercial products :-) The two Big Names (Oracle and Sybase) have pretty well- developed access control. I can't speak to Oracle in detail, but I've used Sybase for years and it has an internal AC mechanism at least as functional as the *nix file system. It offers access control over databases as well as tables, and good granularity (many modes and degrees of access/privilege, user vs group, etc). Maybe an Oracle person can tell us how that engine does access control, but I was under the impression that it uses internal auth tables, like Sybase. I have never liked tying access to external OS usernames. Maybe it's just a personal idiosyncrasy :-) I'd jump for joy if PG access control became OS-independent, with usernames, groups, and passcodes maintained internally to the engine... just my $0.02. de PS I'd also jump for joy if SQL statements could access tables from more than one DB. I can dream, can't I? ............................................................................. :De Clarke, Software Engineer UCO/Lick Observatory, UCSC: :Mail: de@ucolick.org | "There is no problem in computer science that cannot: :Web: www.ucolick.org | be solved by another level of indirection" --J.O. :
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: