Re: backup manifests
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: backup manifests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ddbb128b-86e5-7ffb-b5dc-15a414dfde0e@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: backup manifests (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: backup manifests
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/29/20 9:07 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2020-03-29 20:42:35 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >>> What do you think of having the verification process also call pg_waldump to >>> validate the WAL CRCs (shown upthread)? That looked helpful and simple. >> >> I don't love calls to external binaries, but I think the thing that >> really bothers me is that pg_waldump is practically bound to terminate >> with an error, because the last WAL segment will end with a partial >> record. > > I don't think that's the case here. You should know the last required > record, which should allow to specify the precise end for pg_waldump. If > it errors out reading to that point, we'd be in trouble. Exactly. All WAL generated during the backup should read fine with pg_waldump or there is a problem. -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: