Re: Is pg_restore in 10.6 working?
От | Rob Sargent |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is pg_restore in 10.6 working? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dd80d4b8-6baa-cb56-ced9-e5762ff40aa3@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is pg_restore in 10.6 working? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 11/12/18 2:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> writes: >> On 11/12/18 12:39 PM, David wrote: >>> I'm not following your question. The pre-data and post-data sections >>> each go to an individual file, but the data section goes to a >>> directory. I can restore the files using psql, but it is the restore >>> of the directory that is hanging. > The other bit that I think David is missing is that pg_dump's default > output format is a plain-text SQL script, which is meant to be fed to > psql not pg_restore. To get something that pg_restore can work with, > you need to specify one of the non-text dump formats (typically, you'd > use -Fc or -Fd). > > The situation in which you'd want to use "pg_restore -f" is if you > want to reconstruct a plain-text SQL script from one of the non-text > dump formats, rather than just restoring directly into a database. > > regards, tom lane Roger that. Thank you.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: