Re: Reduce the time required for a database recovery from archive.
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reduce the time required for a database recovery from archive. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dd7f8b17-0c87-3e2c-7a99-f972713dc227@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reduce the time required for a database recovery from archive. (Dmitry Shulga <d.shulga@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reduce the time required for a database recovery from archive.
Re: Reduce the time required for a database recovery from archive. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Dimtry, On 1/11/21 2:51 AM, Dmitry Shulga wrote: > Hi Stephen > > Based on our last discussion I redesigned the implementation of WAL > archive recovery speed-up. Seems like there should have been a patch attached? In any case the current patch no longer applies so marked Waiting on Author. Personally, I'm not too keen on this patch as implemented. Several third-party backup solutions support parallel archive get so it would be nice to support an interface that simply says to the restore_command, "go get 1gb of WAL and write the files here." This patch still assumes that the user has written their own restore command, which is third-party by definition, so I can't see how interfacing with third-party software is an issue here. Also, having multiple workers blindly asking for WAL can cause quite a bit of traffic and cost because PG knows what WAL it wants but it doesn't know what exists. On the other hand, a backup solution can cheaply determine what is available to prevent hammering the archive with requests for files that don't exist. Regards, -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: