Re: Logical replication is missing block of rows when sending initial sync?
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Logical replication is missing block of rows when sending initial sync? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dd5c48d4-8962-d1c9-e71a-6bda23b86401@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Logical replication is missing block of rows when sending initial sync? ("Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Logical replication is missing block of rows when sending initial sync?
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 11/15/23 02:41, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote: > Dear Tomas, Depesz, > >> >>> I'll try reproducing this locally over the weekend. Should I use the >>> test_1030.sh script that you shared a week ago, or do I need to do >>> something more? >> >> That question is probably not to me, but to Hayato Kuroda > > Just FYI - As I posted, this script could not reproduce the issue. We may use the same table definition > but I have not tried yet. I will let you know if I succeeded to reproduce. > FYI I think I've reproduced the issue (with a different script), I've started a thread on pgsql-hackers: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/de52b282-1166-1180-45a2-8d8917ca74c6%40enterprisedb.com Obviously, I can't be sure it's exactly the same issue, but the symptoms seem to match what Depesz reported (gaps in data etc.). I don't know what the root cause is, or fix. But there's more info (and scripts) in the hackers thread. regards -- Tomas Vondra EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: