Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pageinspect / add page_checksum andbt_page_items(bytea)
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pageinspect / add page_checksum andbt_page_items(bytea) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dd28c9bc-c225-eb2c-e844-290e2bfbc178@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pageinspect / add page_checksum andbt_page_items(bytea) (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pageinspect / add page_checksum andbt_page_items(bytea)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/3/17 09:03, Tomas Vondra wrote: > Attached is v2, fixing both issues. I wonder if + bytea *raw_page = PG_GETARG_BYTEA_P(0); + uargs->page = VARDATA(raw_page); is expected to work reliably, without copying the argument to a different memory context. I think it would be better not to maintain so much duplicate code between bt_page_items(text, int) and bt_page_items(bytea). How about just redefining bt_page_items(text, int) as an SQL-language function calling bt_page_items(get_raw_page($1, $2))? For page_checksum(), the checksums are internally unsigned, so maybe return type int on the SQL level, so that there is no confusion about the sign? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: