Re: Partial Index Too Literal?
От | Phillip Mills |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Partial Index Too Literal? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dd0408e50806270817s3893ca8bm3b615303d44ce726@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Partial Index Too Literal? (Lennin Caro <lennin.caro@yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
That example also reports that it uses the index. Only the "is true" variation insists on seq. scan.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Lennin Caro <lennin.caro@yahoo.com> wrote:
use this
explain analyze select * from result where active = 't';
--- On Thu, 6/26/08, Phillip Mills <pmills@systemcore.ca> wrote:From: Phillip Mills <pmills@systemcore.ca>
Subject: [GENERAL] Partial Index Too Literal?
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 7:24 PMUnder somewhat unusual circumstances, rows in one of our tables have an 'active' flag with a true value. We check for these relatively often since they represent cases that need special handling. We've found through testing that having a partial index on that field works well. What seems odd to me, however, is that the index gets used only if the query is a textual match for how the index was specified.
That is, using an index defined as 'where active = true':
dev=# explain analyze select * from result where active = true;
QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bitmap Heap Scan on result (cost=5.31..472.34 rows=4206 width=1126) (actual time=7.868..7.868 rows=0 loops=1)
Filter: active
-> Bitmap Index Scan on result_active_idx (cost=0.00..4.26 rows=2103 width=0) (actual time=4.138..4.138 rows=16625 loops=1)
Index Cond: (active = true)
Total runtime: 7.918 ms
(5 rows)
dev=# explain analyze select * from result where active is true;
QUERY PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on result (cost=0.00..537.26 rows=4263 width=1126) (actual time=55.631..55.631 rows=0 loops=1)
Filter: (active IS TRUE)
Total runtime: 55.668 ms
(3 rows)
This is version 8.2.6. Is there something I'm missing that could make these queries ever produce different results?
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: