Re: Performance problems on 4/8way Opteron (dualcore)
От | William Yu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance problems on 4/8way Opteron (dualcore) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcjer1$16ov$1@news.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance problems on 4/8way Opteron (dualcore) ("J. Andrew Rogers" <jrogers@neopolitan.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
A 4xDC would be far more sensitive to poor NUMA code than 2xDC so I'm not surprised I don't see performance issues on our 2xDC w/ < 2.6.12. J. Andrew Rogers wrote: > On 7/30/05 12:57 AM, "William Yu" <wyu@talisys.com> wrote: > >>I haven't investigated the 2.6.12+ kernel updates yet -- I probably will >>do our development servers first to give it a test. > > > > The kernel updates make the NUMA code dual-core aware, which apparently > makes a big difference in some cases but not in others. It makes some > sense, since multi-processor multi-core machines will have two different > types of non-locality instead of just one that need to be managed. Prior to > the v2.6.12 patches, a dual-core dual-proc machine was viewed as a quad-proc > machine. > > The closest thing to a supported v2.6.12 kernel that I know of is FC4, which > is not really supported in the enterprise sense of course. > > > J. Andrew Rogers > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: