Re: Outdated replication protocol error?
| От | Jeff Davis |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Outdated replication protocol error? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | dcef9eaae8fc6d8f6f260ff3d051c197cdd29a8e.camel@j-davis.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Outdated replication protocol error? (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Outdated replication protocol error?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2021-06-16 at 16:17 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> I think we should explicitly compute the current timeline before
> using
> ThisTimelineID. E.g. in StartReplication() call a new version of
> GetFlushRecPtr() that also returns the current timeline id.
I think all we need to do is follow the pattern in IdentifySystem() by
calling:
am_cascading_walsender = RecoveryInProgress();
first. There are three cases:
1. If the server was a primary the last time RecoveryInProgress() was
called, and it's still a primary, then it returns false immediately.
ThisTimeLineID should be set properly already.
2. If the server was a secondary the last time RecoveryInProgress() was
called, and now it's a primary, then it updates ThisTimeLineID in
InitXLOGAccess() and returns false.
3. If the server was a secondary the last time, and is still a
secondary, then it returns true. Then, StartReplication() will call
GetStandbyFlushRecPtr(), which will update ThisTimeLineID.
It was confusing to me for a while because I was trying to sort out
whether am_cascading_walsender and/or ThisTimeLineID could be out of
date, and how that would result in not updating ThisTimeLineID; and
also why there was a difference between IdentifySystem() and
StartReplication().
Simple patch attached. I didn't test it yet, but wanted to post my
analysis.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: