Re: perltidy version

On 3/5/18 09:02, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>     I think we should just pick some recent one and use it for X years; use
>     that one for all backbranches.  I propose X=3.  I propose 20170521
>     (newer ones seem to cater for stuff that I think we mostly don't use).
> 
> 
> 20140328 seems to cover *most* versions. Another argument for that one
> would be it's the one that we have on Borka, which is where we build the
> official release tarballs, so we can use that as a stable fallback.
> 
> Those are both fairly weak arguments though. As long as we have good
> instructions for how to make a local install of it that doesn't affect
> the rest of the system, then that should not matter. And we need such
> instructions anyway, since it won't be on every distribution. 

Did we decide on this?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services