Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions
| От | Scott Marlowe |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | dcc563d11003231701j4b9b2b98r34cc090bd1526a40@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> writes: >> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Dave Crooke <dcrooke@gmail.com> wrote: >>> What about InnoDB? > >> Depends on what parts of mysql they otherwise use. There are plenty >> of features that won't work if you're using non-myisam tables, like >> full text search. I tend to think any full blown (or nearly so) db is >> overkill for mythtv, and the use of something like sqllite or berkely >> db tables is a better fit. > > That's apparently also the position of their lead developer; although > considering he's not actually done anything about it for six or more > years, it seems like quite a lame excuse for blocking ports to other > DBs. Methinks he's big on his "comfort-zone".
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: