Re: GZIP of pre-zipped output
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GZIP of pre-zipped output |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d11003212000t313a20d2v47b3e9c9531940b5@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GZIP of pre-zipped output (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au> wrote: > On 22/03/2010 1:04 AM, Dave Crooke wrote: >> >> If you are really so desparate to save a couple of GB that you are >> resorting to -Z9 then I'd suggest using bzip2 instead. >> >> bzip is designed for things like installer images where there will be >> massive amounts of downloads, so it uses a ton of cpu during >> compression, but usually less than -Z9 and makes a better result. > > bzip2 doesn't work very well on gzip'd (deflated) data, though. For good > results, you'd want to feed it uncompressed data, which is a bit of a pain > when the compression is part of the PDF document structure and when you > otherwise want the PDFs to remain compressed. > > Anyway, if you're going for extreme compression, these days 7zip is often a > better option than bzip2. There's often a choice of two packages, 7z, and 7za, get 7za, it's the later model version.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: