Re: Transaction table
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Transaction table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d11003200226m90d165dsc0e5b80b5ec502cd@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Transaction table (Deepa Thulasidasan <deepatulsidasan@yahoo.co.in>) |
Ответы |
Re: Transaction table
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Deepa Thulasidasan <deepatulsidasan@yahoo.co.in> wrote: > Dear All, > > I have a query in postgresql if any one can support. > > A transaction table in a vehicle tracking application is inserted with the current position of each vehicle at regularinterval (seconds). > This transaction table consists of 12 columns, which are of the type varchar, time, numeric or double precision. A newtransaction table is created every day. Total number of records at the end of the day is around 1 million records. Datais only inserted in to this table and there is no update or delete. This table is indexed using 2 columns. Now, we areexpecting this transaction table to grow by 10 times in near future. In this regard, we would like to know if this samestructure of the transaction table and the indexing would be sufficient for quick retrivel of data or do we have topartition this table? If so what kind of partition would be suitable? You generally wanna partition on the one (or maybe two) fields you'll regularly use to restrict your data set. For many systems like this that is a partition on date. Sometimes you can partition on two things, and if it makes sense to do so your current usage patterns will show it. Normally one axis of partitioning is fine.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: