Re: autovacuum question
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: autovacuum question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d11003090656w63d1c6a4u4b8e538a83d7e81f@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: autovacuum question ("Scot Kreienkamp" <SKreien@la-z-boy.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: autovacuum question
Re: autovacuum question |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 6:47 AM, Scot Kreienkamp <SKreien@la-z-boy.com> wrote: > Wish I could Tom. I need a non-production, read-write copy of the > database that is updated every 1-2 hours from production. I don't set > this requirement, the business does. I just have to do it if it's > technically possible. > > I found a way to do it very easily using LVM snapshots and WAL log > shipping, but the net effect is I'm bringing a new LVM snapshot copy of > the database out of recovery every 1-2 hours. That means I'd have to > spend 15 minutes, or one-quarter of the time, doing an analyze every > time I refresh the database. That's fairly painful. The LVM snap and > restart only takes 1-2 minutes right now. > > If you have any other ideas how I can accomplish or improve this I'm all > ears. I'm gonna take a scientific wild-assed guess that the real issue here is caching, or more specifically, lack thereof when you first start up your copy of the db.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: