Re: Transaction wraparound problem with database postgres
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Transaction wraparound problem with database postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d11003071826r510e4082x107af429d8c3d25f@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Transaction wraparound problem with database postgres ("Markus Wollny" <Markus.Wollny@computec.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Transaction wraparound problem with database postgres
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Markus Wollny <Markus.Wollny@computec.de> wrote: > Hi! > > After going several months without such incidents, we now got bit by the same problem again. We have since upgraded thehardware we ran the database cluster on and currently use version 8.3.7. The general outline of the problem hasn't changedmuch though - we still don't use the database 'postgres' except for one lone pgagent-job which has only been configureda couple of weeks back and we do a nightly vacuum over all databases in addition the the running of the autovacuumdaemon. As I expect that this might hit again in a couple of months: Any suggestions on what sort of forensic datamight be required to actually find out the root of what's causing it? As I needed to get the cluster back up and runningagain, I used the same remedy as last time and simply dropped the database and recreated it from template1, so there'snot much left to be looked into right now, but if I knew what kind of data to retain I mit be able to come up withsome more useful info next time... Do your logs show any kind of error when vacuuming about "only owner can vacuum" a table or anything?
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: