Re: Replication

2009/6/23 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>:
> On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 18:28 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> The only one that is remotely viable is slony and it is so quirky you
>> may as well forget it.
>
> Like what? I agree that Slony-I is not a plug-in-play replication
> solution, but I don't agree that it is so quirky.
>
>> The rest are in some stage of decay/abandonment. There is no real
>> replication available for postgresql.
>
> There are:
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Replication%2C_Clustering%2C_and_Connection_Pooling
>
> IIRC only Slony-II and PGCluster-II is abandoned. PGCluster-I is not
> up2date, but the others are being worked on.

I wonder how many replication engines for MySQL never got built
because "it already has replication built in"?