Re: Problems with autovacuum
| От | Scott Marlowe |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Problems with autovacuum |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | dcc563d10905250915u3fb94801o82fd4171139d7c86@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Problems with autovacuum (Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
2009/5/25 Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>: > 2009/5/25 Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>: > >> >> So, in 2000 databases, there's only an average of 2 relations per db >> and 102 dead rows? Cause that's all you got room for with those >> settings. >> >> Whats the last 20 or so lines of vacuum verbose as run by a superuser say? > > according to http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/runtime-config-resource.html > max_fsm_relations applies only to tables and indices, and it says "in > database", so I presume that means per database. In which case, those > settings are ok. > It would be nice, to see if vacuum actually complains about it. The docs say: "These parameters control the size of the shared free space map," Key word being shared.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: