Re: Tuning resource parameters for a logging database.
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Tuning resource parameters for a logging database. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d10905211239v22d4563el1267ae954a79ef1f@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Tuning resource parameters for a logging database. (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote: > Below, I meant with a logging / reporting database... > With a logging database you're optimizing two often opposing actions. > Lots of small inserts in a stream that HAVE to get processed and put > in efficiently. This is often accomplished with minimum > shared_buffers and work_mem, because there's no need for the overhead > of large shared_buffers and insert queries for logging dbs don't need > much work_mem. > > With a reporting database you run queries that chew up tons of memory > both shared_buffers and work_mem for efficient operation. > >> work_mem = 128MB > > Bigger than needed for logging, good for reporting. You can probably > just leave it. Note that you can set work_mem per user, so have the reporting users log in with a different user and you can crank this up a bit, say 512M to 1G if you're only ever running 1 or 2 reports. Careful about running the machine out of memory, work_mem is a foot gun if you set it too high and run a lot of queries at once.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: