Re: partition question for new server setup
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: partition question for new server setup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d10904281056x1c1257b9tfe308c4e0cb3dc08@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: partition question for new server setup (Whit Armstrong <armstrong.whit@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: partition question for new server setup
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Whit Armstrong <armstrong.whit@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, Scott. > > Just to clarify you said: > >> postgres. So, my pg_xlog and all OS and logging stuff goes on the >> RAID-10 and the main store for the db goes on the RAID-10. > > Is that meant to be that the pg_xlog and all OS and logging stuff go > on the RAID-1 and the real database (the > /var/lib/postgresql/8.3/main/base directory) goes on the RAID-10 > partition? Yeah, and extra 0 jumped in there. Faulty keyboard I guess. :) OS and everything but base is on the RAID-1. > This is very helpful. Thanks for your feedback. > > Additionally are there any clear choices w/ regard to filesystem > types? Our choices would be xfs, ext3, or ext4. Well, there's a lot of people who use xfs and ext3. XFS is generally rated higher than ext3 both for performance and reliability. However, we run Centos 5 in production, and XFS isn't one of the blessed file systems it comes with, so we're running ext3. It's worked quite well for us.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: