Re: Strange behaviour with a query
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Strange behaviour with a query |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d10904170330t5bd8accdva0b4b77bca4286d1@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Strange behaviour with a query (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Strange behaviour with a query
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:17 AM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Iñigo Martinez Lasala >> <imartinez@vectorsf.com> wrote: >>> Hi everybody again. >>> >>> Deleting rel_dis_can_fk index has solved the problem! But.... why?? >> >> Hard to say without explain analyze output. >> > > I'd hazard a guess that you're getting a lot more rows back from the > bitmap scan of rel_dis_can_fk than the query planner expects. But > that's just a guess. Try craniking up your default stats setting and running analyze again and seeing if it runs fast even with the index.
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: