Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d10904121641l627a315eu9e9ab85afb66c6fd@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production ("Rainer Mager" <rainer@vanten.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Rainer Mager <rainer@vanten.com> wrote: > We use Postgres 8.x in production on Windows Server 2003. We have not done a > direct head-to-head comparison against any *nix environment, so I can't > really compare them, but I can still give a few comments. Just wondering, what version are you actually running? Big differences from 8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3 and soon 8.4. For people taking your advice on running on windows, it helps them make a decision on whether or not to upgrade. > First of all, it seems that some of the popular file systems in *nix are > more robust at preventing disk fragmentation than NTFS is. Because of this I > definitely recommend have some defragging solution. What we've settled on in Linux file systems still fragment, they just don't tend to fragment as much. As the drive gets closer to being full fragmentation will become more of a problem.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: