Re: Raid 10 chunksize
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Raid 10 chunksize |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d10904010954u582600a9t721fd1a2050a802f@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Raid 10 chunksize (Stef Telford <stef@ummon.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Raid 10 chunksize
Re: Raid 10 chunksize |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Stef Telford <stef@ummon.com> wrote: > Scott Marlowe wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Stef Telford <stef@ummon.com> wrote: >> >>> I do agree that the benefit is probably from write-caching, but I >>> think that this is a 'win' as long as you have a UPS or BBU adaptor, >>> and really, in a prod environment, not having a UPS is .. well. Crazy ? >>> >> >> You do know that UPSes can fail, right? En masse sometimes even. >> > Hello Scott, > Well, the only time the UPS has failed in my memory, was during the > great Eastern Seaboard power outage of 2003. Lots of fond memories > running around Toronto with a gas can looking for oil for generator > power. This said though, anything could happen, the co-lo could be taken > out by a meteor and then sync on or off makes no difference. Meteor strike is far less likely than a power surge taking out a UPS. I saw a whole data center go black when a power conditioner blew out, taking out the other three power conditioners, both industrial UPSes and the switch for the diesel generator. And I have friends who have seen the same type of thing before as well. The data is the most expensive part of any server.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: