Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d10812011539w4bc71575ma927f53eb5b7d76d@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again" (Jason Long <mailing.list@supernovasoftware.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Jason Long <mailing.list@supernovasoftware.com> wrote: > Greg Smith wrote: > > I wonder if I'm the only one who just saved a copy of that post for > reference in case it gets forcibly removed... > > Recently I was thinking about whether I had enough material to warrant a > 2008 update to "Why PostgreSQL instead of MySQL"; who would have guessed > that Monty would do most of the research I was considering for me? > > -- > * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD > > I quit using MySQL years ago when the default table type did not have > transactions and subqueries were not existent. The features I was looking > for were already in PostgreSQL for several versions. > > I am surprised to see such an honest post regarding MySQL. > > "Sun Picks Up MySQL For $1 Billion" to bad for them they did not go with > PostgreSQL. :) It's free. The pgsql community, however, is priceless.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: