Re: Code Organisation
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Code Organisation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d10811181955xbe936c3ha348e0f3196341c9@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Code Organisation ("Ravi Chemudugunta" <chemuduguntar@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Ravi Chemudugunta <chemuduguntar@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I realise this may be a subjective topic ; however: > > what does everyone think about grouping a set of functions together, > by related it maybe that they call on each other but more so live in > the same file on disk (before they get submitted) ... we are trying to > use the output of pg_dump for versioning rather than having our own > file for e.g. inventory.sql under the tree somewhere. > > (does anyone have any ideas on the topic of version control itself ?) > > The only problem with doing it this way is once the functions get > admitted into the database (and our inventory.sql file is deleted > because it will incorporated into pg_dump somewhere) all context is > lost, You're halfway there. Just make a table called something like changetrack (id int primary key, description text); and then every update to your database make it look something like this: begin; insert into changetrack (id,description) values (1,'First update, create simple schema'); create table... alter table... yada yada yada commit; and repeat that for each update. Then you can see which were applied just by looking at your changetrack table. You can have multiple updates in a file, and group the ones together into individual transactions that make sense.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: