Re: Server Crash
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Server Crash |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d10804220921n688d16f6h4b5f921b5b38b48b@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Server Crash (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Server Crash
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:scott.marlowe@gmail.com] > > >> Kill -9 is the "shoot it in the head" signal. It is not > >> generated by postgresql in normal operation. It can be > >> generated by "pg_ctl -m immediate stop" . At least I think > >> that's what signal it sends. > > Just for the archives: Postgres never generates kill -9 at all. > (Immediate stop uses SIGQUIT, instead.) When you see that in > the log, you can be sure it was a manual action or the OOM killer. Thanks. Just wondering, what's the difference in behavior from pgsql's perspective from sigquit and siqkill? Is sigkill more dangerous than sigquit?
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: