Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d10803171457v11d0b607p2eb594a02284114c@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Benchmark: Dell/Perc 6, 8 disk RAID 10 (Enrico Sirola <enrico.sirola@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Enrico Sirola <enrico.sirola@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Justin, > > Il giorno 17/mar/08, alle ore 20:38, Justin ha scritto: > > > it is a RAID 10 controller with 6 SAS 10K 73 gig drives. The > > server is 3 weeks old now. > > > > it has 16 gigs of RAM > > 2 quad core Xenon 1.88 Ghz processors > > 2 gig Ethernet cards. RAID controller perc 6/i with battery backup > > 512meg cache, setup not lie about fsync > > > > WAL is on a RAID 0 drive along with the OS > > Did you try with a single raid 10 hosting DB + WAL? It gave me much > better performances on similar hardware > Bye, Note that it can often be advantageous to have one big physical partition on RAID-10 and to then break it into logical partitions for the computer, so that you have a partition with just ext2 for the WAL and since it has its own file system you usually get better performance without having to actually hard partition out a separate RAID-1 or RAID-10 for WAL.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: