Re: postgre vs MySQL
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgre vs MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d10803112011w7d4b554bx32ecc433bd84809a@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgre vs MySQL (Justin <justin@emproshunts.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgre vs MySQL
Re: postgre vs MySQL |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Justin <justin@emproshunts.com> wrote: > > > I view updates/patches of any kind like this, if ain't broke don't fix it. > I normally only update computers with security patches only after i prove it > don't destroy installs. But that's juast it. When a postgresql update comes out, it is precisely because the database IS broken. A bug that might eat your data or allow an attacker to get into your database are the kinds of fixes, and the only kind really, that go into production pgsql releases. I too wait a day or two to test it on a staging server, but I've never had a pgsql update blow back in my face, and I've done an awful lot of them.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: