Re: Mechanics of Select
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Mechanics of Select |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d10802111521t5a6f35d8s6b86c570289f9040@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Mechanics of Select (Alban Hertroys <dalroi@solfertje.student.utwente.nl>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Feb 11, 2008 3:56 AM, Alban Hertroys <dalroi@solfertje.student.utwente.nl> wrote: > On Feb 11, 2008, at 2:23 AM, Willem Buitendyk wrote: > > > As others have suggested my big problem with the function I wrote > > was that I had made it Volatile instead of Immutable (it is no > > doubt suffering from code bloat as well). That made all the > > difference. Curiously though - I tried it just with the date_trunc > > function and it was just as slow as my old Volatile function. > > > > select * from track where datetime >= '2007-04-01' and datetime < > > date_trunc('month','2007-04-01'::timestamp)+interval '1 month'; was > > about 55s > > That's probably because '2007-04-01'::timestamp can be at different > time zones depending on client configuration and hence is volatile. > > If you need a timestamp you probably want to use the servers TZ, > which you can specify using: timestamp at <your timezone> No, straight up timestamps shouldn't have this problem, only timestamptz. I'd suggest trying an index on the date_trunc function here and see if that helped.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: