Re: Lockless pg_buffercache
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Lockless pg_buffercache |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d10802100139n5f92062eg152c63628828ef1@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Lockless pg_buffercache ("Markus Bertheau" <mbertheau.pg@googlemail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Lockless pg_buffercache
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Feb 9, 2008 10:34 PM, Markus Bertheau <mbertheau.pg@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I want to use the pg_buffercache contrib module for monitoring our > server. It takes a lock on all buffers and then on each buffer header > in order to get a consistent picture of the buffers. I would be > running the function provided by the module once every 5 minutes. If it takes 500mS every 5 minutes that might be an acceptable decrease in performance for that second or two. > I'm worrying about the performance hit of that - a comment in the code > says it's horrible for concurrency. It is, but again, it really depends on the time frame etc. If you can run it quickly as a series of related queries or a user function, it should be fast enough to not be a significant burden. So, what's the real burden like from the pg_buffercache contrib module?
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: