Re: top posting (was: Hijack!)
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: top posting (was: Hijack!) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d10712111000w24e1dcb3m56f72fd857628f@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: top posting (was: Hijack!) ("Leif B. Kristensen" <leif@solumslekt.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: top posting (was: Hijack!)
Re: top posting Re: top posting (was: Hijack!) Re: top posting (was: Hijack!) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Dec 11, 2007 11:41 AM, Leif B. Kristensen <leif@solumslekt.org> wrote: > > It certainly isn't a crime. But it's a bit like thread hijacking in the > sense that a well-formed inline posting is more likely to attract > intelligent replies. I don't think that I'm the only one who tends to > skip top posting replies on mailing lists. You're certainly not. I can't tell you how many times I've carefully replied to someone with inline quoting, only to get some top post response. I then ask them politely not to top post, fix the format, reply, and get another top post reponse. At that point I just move on to the next thread.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: