Re: Trigger AFTER UPDATE OR INSERT
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Trigger AFTER UPDATE OR INSERT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d10710210718h4c9dd9efpd81108206105b342@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Trigger AFTER UPDATE OR INSERT (yogesh <yogesh.arora.daffodil@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Please help (backup)
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On 10/20/07, yogesh <yogesh.arora.daffodil@gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 19, 11:05 pm, scott.marl...@gmail.com ("Scott Marlowe") wrote: > > Yes, it's right. Triggers are part of a transaction (or run their > > own) so if the trigger fails, so does the transaction. > > > > If you really need to have something insert rather or not the > > transaction succeeds, you can either use savepoints so that you can > > roll back to before the error then insert the row anyway, or use > > dblink to connect to the db through another backend and commit your > > data that way. > > > > You might want to give more info on exactly what you're trying to do > > so the folks on the list can make better informed recommendations. > Hello Scott, > Thanks to you.... > you got the right point point what i want to know....... > > are you saying about programming or any other way to done > it........to insert a row even if the Trigger fails or succeeds Read up on savepoints here: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/sql-savepoint.html
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: