Re: Seeking practice recommendation: is there ever a use case to have two or more superusers?
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Seeking practice recommendation: is there ever a use case to have two or more superusers? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | db7dc42f-e91b-e7f6-f2e2-eddb58d200e9@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Seeking practice recommendation: is there ever a use case to have two or more superusers? (Bryn Llewellyn <bryn@yugabyte.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Seeking practice recommendation: is there ever a use case to have two or more superusers?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 11/21/22 11:46, Bryn Llewellyn wrote: >>> >>> Nobody supports it! >> >> I went back through the thread and don't anywhere when you made the >> above statement, correct me if I am wrong. In that case there was >> nothing to support or not support until now. What people where >> responding to the title of the thread: >> >>> "Seeking practice recommendation: is there ever a use case to have >>> two or more superusers?" >> >> That is a different ask. > > I didn't mean to say that I'd already written the sentence that starts > "It is good practice to limit the number of superuser roles that exist > in a cluster...". Sorry if I gave that impression. It was just a > strawman version of what I practice recommendation might look like that > used the same general wording style as the one about "a role that has > the CREATEDB and CREATEROLE". > Still, why the "Nobody supports it!" statement for a recommendation that only appeared at the same time? I for one have a poor record of mind reading and/or predicting the future:) -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: